Increasing Hourly Rates of Accountants – I

We all are taught one thing that is EXCELLENCE… Give Your Best… Put 100%.

As a consultant, advisor, accountant, service provider, we have always tried our best to provide the best of what we can to our clients.

Do we get paid commensurately for providing the best what we can?

Over and over, I have got answer to this question in negative from CPAs, consultants, advisors and now virtual CFOs.

There could be one of the three possibilities concerning this.

  1. Fairly paid: It is human psychology to always think what we perceive ‘is the best’, is the best and should be valued very highly. That is not true in most cases. There are many other people on this planet providing similar or even better services to their clients at comparable prices. And believe me, your clients tend to compare you with them. It is not you v/s yourself. It is you v/s many brilliant service providers.

 

This is true for any service profession and not only CPA practice. I have, in my consulting practice, many service industry clients. All of them have the same feeling and accounting profession is not the only one facing this issue.

 

  1. Underpaid: Another possibility is, actually, you are providing really great service to your client if not the best on the planet. And yet, you are underpaid to a great extent for such services.

 

  1. Overpaid: Third possibility is, actually, you think you are underpaid for the kind of services you are providing. However, you are overpaid when compared to what other similar level people are providing. Because, that is what the industry standard is.

 

In all of the above scenarios, you can get paid more than what you are right now.

In my coming posts, I will try to address the above scenarios one by one and explore possible solutions that can be adopted by the CPA firms.

Hint: In profession, it is not necessary to provide the best. However, it is necessary to provide the best perceived value to the clients.

Silicon Valley Bank crisis and implications for accountants

On social media, everyone is talking about banking crisis especially Silicon Valley Bank crisis and the causes of it. Everyone views the problem from their angle and so does Altobooks.

What we have understood is that the entire problem is an accounting and reporting problem.

We have accounting standards – be it US GAAP or IFRS, requiring companies to do accounting for Held to Maturity (HTM) Securities on amortized basis. The purpose of the same is that the short-term volatility of the instruments does not have the same volatile effect on the financial statements of the entity, when the instruments are supposed to be held till maturity and cashflows would not have effect of the temporary volatility.

In case of SVB, their balance sheet was loaded with HTM securities and the same were amortized. This made their financial reports not reflecting the real losses they were sitting on.

And suddenly, they made marked to market accounting for HTM securities thereby accounting for huge losses on their HTM securities. Of course, they were not willing to do this. They had to do this because of accounting standards.

The very purpose of the accounting standards for HTM securities has turned against the SVB.

High time FASB and IASB deliberates on this.

This article is brought to you by Altobooks research team.

Altobooks is a global accounting and offshoring firm providing offshore staffing solutions to CPAs. Altobooks also provides services to individuals and corporates for accounting, tax, finance. For more information, stay tuned to Altobooks blogs section.